FacebookTwitterDiggStumbleuponGoogle BookmarksRedditTechnoratiLinkedin

Welcome

The Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project is a group dedicated to researching Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (often referred to as LENR) while sharing all procedures, data, and results openly online. We rely on comments from online contributors to aid us in developing our experiments and contemplating the results. We invite everyone to participate in our discussions, which take place in the comments of our experiment posts. These links can be seen along the right-hand side of this page. Please browse around and give us your feedback. We look forward to seeing you around Quantum Heat.

Join us and become part of the project. Become one of the active commenters, who question our work and suggest next steps.

Or, if you are an experimenter, talk to us about becoming an affiliated lab and doing your work in a Live Open Science manner.

From Francesco

Dear Colleagues,

I am analyzing the latest results, made by Constantan (600L) and Pt wires (diameter 100micron).

More recently I made a mixture of H2(30%) and Ar (70%).

The total pressure was 3 bar ABS, slowing decreasing over time the amount of H2 (more permeable).

* I have the strong "feeling" that the most important parameter is the HIGH temperature. 

I found a larger increase of performances when the Pt temperature, in mean, was >430°C.

My suggestion is to increase the temperature of the wire/cell as much as possible, with SOME H2 added.

My best,

Francesco

Add comment

Security code
Refresh

Comments   

 
+1 #7 bob 2013-09-24 13:18
@123star I agree with item 3 completely. I would add that we should switch to some form of heat collecting/inte grating calorimeter. The closest we've come so far is the water bucket test. Water is a pretty good heat collector/integ rator. This serves to eliminate any longitudinal dependance for temperature sensing. Water is good but to simplify we might even get away with air as the integrating fluid. eg. empty bucket insulated top and bottom with small fan. While we are at it we should add one extra temperature sensor on the outside of the bucket and plot heat flux vs delta temp across the bucket wall. My prediction is that we get a good corelation.
Quote
 
 
+3 #6 123star 2013-09-24 08:40
Hi there! I am still following your posts even if I am not writing anymore. I think I could say "I told you so" but, we have still to quantify this effect to know if it can be neglected or not.
I'd say that this effect could account for a output heat overestimate of about 5% (ballpark figure).

My suggestions are:

(1) Do a thorough temperature sweep test with supposedly inert wires (NiCr). While keeping the same input power, vary the diameter and/or the number of wires in the calorimeter (i.e. you have to vary the radiating area, which is the total wire surface). Plot T_ext vs "total wire surface radiating area".

(2) Paint one of the copper bands that hold the thermocouples with an IR absorbing paint (just paint the internal-facing side), and see if this worsen the "temperature dependence behavior" of the thermocouple being held by the painted copper band.

(3) Switch to a 100% opaque calorimeter as soon as possible.
Quote
 
 
+4 #5 Paul 2013-09-24 02:41
Ecco has been asking for the foil wrap for quite awhile. I think it's time to give it a try.
Quote
 
 
+6 #4 bob 2013-09-24 00:19
One very easy way to " check" if IR transmission through the glass is a significant contributor to heat transfer is to wrap the tube in foil. If the interior temperature is significantly higher for given input power with foil then IR loss is significant.
Quote
 
 
+2 #3 Ecco 2013-09-23 16:59
@Ryan Hunt: below a wavelength of about 2.7 um, borosilicate glass becomes mostly transparent, depending on its thickness and other technical characteristics . Its transmittance also briefly peaks at 3 um and 4 um, to a lower extent.



Although it's true that in general borosilicate glass is rather opaque to IR, it still allows a relevant amount of energy to leave the cell though that pathway, especially as temperatures get increased. Furthermore, the fact that the wires and the interior of the cell aren't ideal blackbodies adds much uncertainty to exactly how much emitted energy leaves the cell. I think this is a good reason to use 100% opaque tubes.

Here's a spectral radiance chart calculator, by the way:

wolframalpha.com/.../...
Quote
 
 
0 #2 Ryan Hunt 2013-09-23 16:27
The difference between the glass cells and the multi-wire test int he CTC is that the wire can be heated directly in the glass cell. We do not have that ability on the multi-wire test without some significant re-wiring.

The borosilicate glass is very opaque to IR. I do not think much of the heat radiates out. It also is a rather good thermal conductor, so it will tent to lose heat that way pretty well.
Quote
 
 
+9 #1 Ecco 2013-09-23 16:18
I told you so!

The temperature/exc ess power behavior (yet to be confirmed - I have to stress this - but very promising) of the latest multi-wire CTC cell experiment indeed seems to point to this. This is why I've been telling to crank up input power to make temperatures increase to 500°C and beyond. The excess power rise with temperature seems exponential, but at lower temperatures you're basically playing with hard to measure sub-watt excess heat.

Unfortunately due to technical limitations increasing temperatures substantially just isn't possible in standard glass tube cells. Also, the very fact that they're transparent means that much input energy leaves the cell without heating the wires and that therefore it's wasted.
Quote
 

Here is your generous contributions so far towards our $500,000 target, thanks everyone! : $45,020   Please Donate
See the current state of our booked costs here