FacebookTwitterDiggStumbleuponGoogle BookmarksRedditTechnoratiLinkedin

.:StarDust:. [UPDATE#2 - Part 2: Matryoshka]

Written by Robert Greenyer on .

Shake and bake...

Imagine you had worked all your life in the nuclear industry and this had fuelled a burning curiosity to investigate further.

Imagine that you had spent decades reviewing and contemplating scientific findings from over 100 years that were just too ahead of their time to be accepted by the mainstream.

Imagine that when you started to look at this old work and apply modern understanding that you not only found out that the original researchers were on to something, but that by re-visiting that work and taking it further, you saw the building blocks of organic life emerging in your data.

Can the truth really be that we are all made from and by stardust?


Part 1 - Introduction

Dr György Egely has taken a hard look over the past few decades at what preceded Pons & Fleischmann's work, from his view as a life-long professional nuclear engineer. What he saw was an array of experiments and observations that were overlooked, miss-interpreted or dismissed but one in particular, that of George Ohsawa caught his eye because he identified that several independent research groups had observed the same phenomena but without really thinking about the underlying process.

We are honoured and proud to announce that we will be working with him and you the crowd to open up his research which goes far farther than any other researcher has done to date in the field of 'dusty plasmas'. György understands from his review of history that those that do not reach out rarely see the fruits of their imagination realised in their time - we hope others in the community can step back from the continually failed route of closed research. Of course, we will publish the work in its entirety.

Since starting our collaboration we have identified several other researchers who have replicated and extended Ohsawa's work and we look forward to reporting and collating their contributions with you through next year. We encourage you to try and get ahead of our reporting - it'll be fun, there is much to discover - it is like a whole other world.

György and his fellow researchers have already provided us with schematics for his last two generations of microwave resonant chambers which we hope MFMP followers can help us fabricate - we know many of you have machine shops and are handy with a welding plant. Please let us know.

Additionally, his colleagues have already furnished us with several generations of magnetron power supply control circuit schematics and similarly, we would be interested to hear from those with power electronic/electrical skill sets in order to help us fabricate these units.

Lastly, if anyone knows good quartz glass manufacturers / suppliers (there are several we have identified) in different geographies - then we'd like to hear about them, as we will need to create high temperature acoustical resonators which form the core of the reactor. There are other areas where you might be able to pitch in - so keep an eye on this developing story.

With an SEM/EDX to hand or a good chemistry lab, there is a real opportunity to develop a bench top device that will be able to transmute elements repeatably in the time it takes you to warm up soup.

With your engagement, 2017 can be the year that controlled transmutations via electro-mechanical and biological systems (follow our "Life Changing" thread) becomes accepted and the repercussions for medicine, technology and everyones standard of living really start to reveal themselves.

In the spirit of a Francesco Celani e-mail / presentation:

Wishing you ALL a very HAPPY Christmas and a PROSPEROUS new year!!!

Making Iron in a few minutes from Carbon and Air



Here is an older interview from over 5 years ago

In this video he describes how he and a team replicated the Pons & Fleishmann effect “brilliantly” @ 19:25

Videoton funded experiment, old KFKI colleagues did it. Presented to Gabor Szeles - half the time and 1/4 the money to do it as originally planned. Gabor Szeles put other people on the job and GE was cast out - not a penny.

They did it like this, a few micron thin layer of copper was applied to a ceramic plate, on top of this was placed a very thin later of palladium upon which was placed a very thin layer of Nickel. After the first positive results George was nearly beaten to death in a senseless 'random' attack without motive, police came, but then dropped the case saying nothing happened.

Since the early 1900s aspects of the scientific community, that advises politicians and operates at the behest of vested interests exercise what George Egely refers to as a “Criminal Strategy” - they just claim an inconvenient discovery is not true and deny, deny and deny its possibility and frustrate its realisation such they can avoid being proved wrong and in doing so maintain their sponsors monopolies and the subjugation of the masses. It is an anti-sustainable approach to research.

Many people have replicated this since George Ohsawa's discovery, here are a few to wet your appetite - do some digging and you'll find more than you think possible.

UPDATE#2 - Part 2: Matryoshka

Push a swing just a little at a time
Fill a reservoir bucket by bucket

Without losses the swing will eventually throw off its passenger and the reservoir will top its dam.

In this second video, Dr. Egely reveals the secret to the amazing power amplification in his 'Dusty Plasma' reactors.

In this video the phrase "peak potential" is 'maximum ability to accelerate reactants'

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Comments   

 
0 #31 BestRosetta 2018-10-23 03:38
I see you don't monetize your site, don't waste your traffic, you can earn extra bucks every month.
You can use the best adsense alternative for any type of website (they approve all websites), for more info simply
search in gooogle: boorfe's tips monetize your website
Quote
 
 
0 #30 BestLenora 2018-09-07 13:01
I have noticed you don't monetize your blog, don't
waste your traffic, you can earn extra bucks every month.

You can use the best adsense alternative for any type of website (they approve all websites),
for more details simply search in gooogle: boorfe's tips monetize your website
Quote
 
 
0 #29 home page 2018-07-09 14:47
First of all I want to say awesome blog! I had a quick question that I'd like to ask if
you do not mind. I was curious to find out how you center
yourself and clear your thoughts prior to writing.
I've had difficulty clearing my thoughts in getting my thoughts out.

I truly do enjoy writing however it just seems like the first 10 to 15
minutes are usually lost just trying to figure out how to
begin. Any recommendations or hints? Thank you!
Quote
 
 
0 #28 Parking Sensors 2018-05-22 04:52
I believe that is among the most significant information for
me. And i am glad reading your article. However wanna commentary on few
common issues, The site taste is great, the articles
is actually nice : D. Just right task, cheers
Quote
 
 
0 #27 DarlaChief 2018-03-20 19:29
I have checked your blog and i have found some duplicate content, that's why you don't rank high in google,
but there is a tool that can help you to create 100% unique content, search for:
boorfe's tips unlimited content
Quote
 
 
0 #26 SvenChief 2018-03-15 04:57
I have checked your site and i've found some duplicate content, that's why you don't
rank high in google's search results, but there is a tool that can help you
to create 100% unique content, search for; boorfe's tips unlimited content
Quote
 
 
0 #25 ShirleyChief 2018-03-13 13:39
I have checked your blog and i have found some duplicate content, that's why you don't rank high in google's
search results, but there is a tool that can help you to create 100% unique content,
search for: boorfe's tips unlimited content
Quote
 
 
0 #24 DorieChief 2018-03-12 14:47
I have checked your page and i have found some duplicate content, that's why you
don't rank high in google's search results, but there is
a tool that can help you to create 100% unique
content, search for: boorfe's tips unlimited content
Quote
 
 
0 #23 ArianneSmall 2018-01-29 02:21
I have checked your website and i have found some duplicate content, that's why you don't rank high in google, but there is a tool that can help you to create 100% unique content, search for; Boorfe's tips unlimited content
Quote
 
 
0 #22 LastClarissa 2018-01-28 12:18
I see you don't monetize your site, don't waste your traffic,
you can earn additional cash every month because you've got hi quality content.
If you want to know how to make extra $$$, search for: Mertiso's
tips best adsense alternative
Quote
 
 
0 #21 FirstMike 2018-01-01 10:36
I have noticed you don't monetize your blog, don't waste your traffic, you can earn extra cash every month because
you've got hi quality content. If you want to
know how to make extra $$$, search for: Boorfe's tips best adsense alternative
Quote
 
 
0 #20 Robert Greenyer 2017-07-11 14:24
NOVA - Microwave and high intensity sound based transmutation reactor under construction


steemit.com/.../...
Quote
 
 
0 #19 Robert Greenyer 2017-01-12 10:14
Hi Axil,

Actually, I asked Dr. Egely about the SPP Q value before making the video as in his paper her refers to research ... here is a quote:

"A considerable field amplification process takes place on the surface of dust particles, which is one of the bases of our processes. The local electric field can be amplified up to 10^48 times on the surface of micron and nanometer-sized particles. (Details are in Kathrin Kneipp, Physics Today, 2007, Nov, pp40, or Mark I. Stockman: Nano Plasmonics. Physics Today, Feb. 2011, pp39-44.)"

I asked him what the effective value was in his case and he said 10^3. That is the value I included in the presentation.

This system is phenomenally dynamic and non trivial to comprehend. Here are some of my thoughts.

1. Microwaves are EM oscillating and standing waves.

2. The acoustical resonator has 2 tuned ports that create two fundamental out of phase frequencies and there are expansive harmonics of both which therefore create shifting beat frequencies, these are in sub-sonic all the way to extreme ultra-sonic and in some ranges have extremely high dB values. It is my understanding that these physically compress and re-shape the plasma and its internal structure such that any internal process have this action enabling changes in relative field potentials.

3. The reactor works by loading up carbon particles with electrons and then the EM field offsets the balance of these electrons in the particle and the acoustical resonances re-distribute the relative positions of these particles leading to extreme fields between particles. Dr. Egely refers to the offset charge in the particle in his paper saying “Due to this polarisation, an estimated 10^11 V /cm electric field gradient is formed between the poles of the particle (1)”. That is 10 trillion volts per metre.

4. Surface plasmons intensify further the charge density and the field intensity as a result

5. Plasma wakefield acceleration allow for charged particles to be massively accelerated on the wake of plasma movement - this is a by product of having plasma ions in an accelerating field accelerating other components in the system. It is a secondary effect of a plasma in motion, in this case the plasmas motion is not only caused by the effect of fields on ions but also of the acoustic waves - so the fastest ions in the system are actually not merely influenced by EM fields - hence the extreme complexity in getting the message over!
Quote
 
 
0 #18 axil 2017-01-12 02:36
The polariton power amplification factor stated in the video is far to small at 10e3. It is so small that it is in error, I have seen the amplification factor quoted as 10e9 to 10e12 at the top of page 41 (see reference below) conservatively. But in other places, I have seen this amplification factor defined at a maximum level of 10e15.

See:

Nanoplasmonics: The physics behind the applications. Mark I. Stockman.

pdfs.semanticscholar.org/.../. ..
Quote
 
 
0 #17 Robert Greenyer 2017-01-09 11:15
Particles in Motion - NASA discovers why dust particles on the moon and more levitate - could this have implications for dusty plasma?

goo.gl/pounws

From the article:

"The study found that the strange properties of Moon dust combined with UV radiation or plasma from the Sun can loft single particles - or sometimes even large clusters of dust - up above the surface.

This is due to the reaction causing an emission and re-absorption of electrons inside 'micro-cavities ' formed between neighbouring particles, which can generate unexpectedly large electrical charges and intense repulsive forces."

Imagine what kind of repulsive forces are being experienced in Dr György Egely's 'Dusty Plasma' reactor!

Could this be one reason why LENR reactions have been reported to be stimulated by UV and LASER light?

Original report: goo.gl/9LIXYu
Quote
 
 
0 #16 Axil 2016-12-23 22:51
Post 7 part 3

es, what Rossi is producing is "TAO balls" by applying a static charge to those electrodes. Just the optimum charge level produces the TAO balls but too much charge distroys them. Rossi is continually adjusting the charge on those electrodes to optimize his reaction. If Rossi adds to much charge, the balls disperse and the reaction stops.

In a bit of remembrance, DGT people told me privately, that they also saw balls of glowing light floating around inside their reaction chamber. They said that the color was proprietary information but when I guessed that the balls were blue, they said that I was not wrong. In some speculation, the very high electron density on the surface of the "TAO balls" must setup up a auroral ionization of the air around the balls where nitrogen and some oxygen produce colored light emission.

Contrary to most opinion, this sort of reaction insight leads be to beleive that DGT has something going, but that is only an opinion.

But what are the superconducting microparticles that the TAO balls are formed from?

Hydrogen gets absorbed into the occlusions formed in a flaws in the nickel metal where these hydrogen atoms accumulate and form superconducting metalized crystals of gas. The disrupted metal bonds in the nickel apply huge pressure as the hydrogen accumulates. So nickel with many flaws is good for LENR. These crystals have been determined to be superconducting by demonstrating the Meissner effect in experiments by by Miley and Holmlid(1). These crystals can leave the lattice and remain superconducting and structurally intact in a metastable state. It is the metal bonds strengthen by the imperfections in the metal lattice that compress the hydrogen together to form metalized hydrogen.

Quote:
1- phys.unsw.edu.au/.../...

Ultrahigh-density deuterium of Rydberg matter clusters for inertial confinement fusion targets Leif Holmlid , Heinrich Hora, George Miley, and Xiaoling Yang
But what keeps these superconducting hydrogen crystal together over time, when the nickel bonds are gone what ties the hydrogen atoms together?

You are sitting in your chair right now because of the repulsive force that is produced by the electrons in your butt. In superconducting metalize hydrogen, EMF does not penetrate into the hydrogen crystal; this behavior is called the Meissner effect. In addition, electrons are repelled away from the surface of the hydrogen crystal. This EMF shield makes this crystal very tough. This EMF shell enables this crystal to withstand very high heat and pressure.

There is a charge amplification process that must somehow be going on to add strength to the metalized hydrogen EMF shield. We know that there are huge numbers of electrons being produced in the LENR reaction. Those electrons must contribute to the electric charge that accumulated on the surface of the metallized nanowires. This positive feedback loop in electron production must produce such strong EMF shielding that the nanowire become imperious to heat and pressure.

Mark LeClair says that the ability for cavitation to erode any substance including diamond is due to the shielding that superconductivi ty of metalized water provides. When a cavitation bubble collapses and the metalized water crystal jets forward at many times the speed of sound, the diamond gives way but not the charge on the surface of the water crystal. The accumulated negative charge of all the electrons at the tip of this water based nanowire points the nanowire forward to the solid surface of the material. So most of the electrons aggregate at the tip of the nanowire. Now we will understand how charge works both on metalized hydrogen and TAO balls.
Quote
 
 
0 #15 Axil 2016-12-23 22:50
Post 7 part 2

Quote:
Theorists succumb to Tao

Mysterious microscopic spheres could point towards an unconventional theory for superconductivity

From: the Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia US

Some 20 years ago physicists thought they understood almost everything about superconductivity. Below a certain temperature elements such as mercury suddenly lose all resistance to electric current due to electrons forming pairs, in accordance with the famous Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory. But in 1986 the discovery of copper oxide materials that become superconducting at relatively high temperatures wrecked this view. Today, high-temperature superconductivity in the cuprates still remains a puzzle, but could it be that our understanding of conventional superconductors is even beginning to show cracks? According to Jorge Hirsch of the University of California in San Diego, a phenomenon called the Tao effect cannot be explained by the conventional BCS theory, and instead requires an alternative electrodynamic description that applies to all superconductors (Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 187001).

Superconducting surprise: The Tao effect was discovered in 1999 by the present author and co-workers at Southern Illinois University and Princeton University. To our complete surprise, when we applied a strong electric field to a group of superconducting microparticles we found that millions of them spontaneously aggregated into balls about a millimetre in size. Normal metallic particles either bounce between the two electrodes in a DC electric field or form chains in an AC electric field, so the field-induced formation of balls appears to be unique to superconductors.

The Tao effect was first observed with powders of high-temperature superconductors such as bismuth strontium calcium copper oxide. However, subsequent experiments performed in 2002 and 2003 with low-temperature superconducting powders, and also with magnesium diboride, confirmed that die effect occurs for all superconductors. The interaction between superconductors and an electric or magnetic field is an important topic in superconductivity. As early as 1935, more than 60 years before superconducting balls were first observed, Fritz London and his brother Heinz suggested that superconductors and normal conductors should respond differently to static electric fields. In particular, they predicted that a static electric field could penetrate into superconductors as far as a static magnetic field. In our initial experiments with low-temperature superconductors, we found that two critical values of electric field occurred as the strength of the field was increased. The first was the point at which the superconducting microparticles suddenly started to aggregate into stable balls, beyond which the size of the ball started to decrease until the second critical value was reached. At this point, the balls instantaneously disintegrated and flew onto the electrodes.
Quote
 
 
0 #14 Axil 2016-12-23 22:45
Post 7 part 1

Metalized compounds that have free electrons covering the positive charges (holes) will be superconducting at high temperatures while the structure of the superconducting compound is maintained. In metalized hydrogen, all the holes are located in the center of the crystal(nanowir e) and the electrons are orbiting on the outside of this positive core lattice. Highly compressed hydrogen holes and associated electron bonds lead to high temperature superconductivity,



www.youtube.com/.../

Superconductivity is important in LENR because it directs how electric charge and magnetism behaves in LENR. One of the clues that bring us to that conclusion is some details that have slipped out of the normally secretive experimental observations from LENR experimentalists.

For example Fulvio Fabiani states:

Quote:
"We have it all filmed, which still cannot be disclosed. We have photographs of creatures that emit pure light that have completely melted the reactor down, all in a very quiet way. You just turn off the stimuli system and the reaction is switched off. It’s impressive."
I would like to venture an opinion about what those balls of light are and how they are created and how they are destroyed. Those balls of light seem to be the origin or active agent in the Rossi reaction.

Another clue comes from the Rossi patent and that clue provides some insight into Rossi's potential control mechanism. The patent describes a set of electrodes that produce an electric field of 100,000 volts. Rossi is exposing his reaction to a very high electric field. The idea is that an electrostatic field produces these balls of light. I would like to venture some speculation about how that is done.

The next concept to introduce is "Hole Superconductivity"

Quote:
sdphln.ucsd.edu/.../hole.html
This reference has more than 100 sub-references if you are interested.
"Hole Superconductivity" pushes out of the positive core of the crystal all electrons and magnetism to the surface of the crystal in a meissner effect.

Quote:
arxiv.org/pdf/1103.3912.pdf

Kinetic energy driven superconductivity, the origin of the Meissner effect, and the reductionist frontier
J. E. Hirsch
Now we get to the punch line, "The Tao effect"
Quote
 
 
0 #13 Axil 2016-12-23 22:26
Post 6

I found another interesting experiment that G.A. Shafeev collaborated in that was not included in the list that I initially sent to you.

Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium under exposure of solid targets in heavy water

arxiv.org/.../1306.0830.pdf

Other systems using laser irradiation of various transition metal nanostructures show both the formation of tritium and its rapid decay as a simultaneous operation.

I like these laser based experiments that reveal in the most basic terms what is happening in the bare bones LENR reaction.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is the point relating to the aforementioned statement:

Superconductivity is central to the LENR reaction because it brings coherence as an indispensable catalytic factor to the LENR reaction.

The LENR reaction is produced by a greatly amplified weak force interaction with matter that destabilizes nuclear matter through coherence.

Like any other subatomic particle, protons and neutrons are inherently unstable. They just appear stable because of their long half lives. The supersymmetry (SUSY) prediction of the grand unification theories, such as the SU(5) Georgi–Glashow model and SO(10) is on the order of 10e34–10e36 yr

en.wikipedia.org/.../...

Particle physics is based on finding supersymmetry to complete the standard model. Not finding proton decay would mean that the standard model was wrong.

To produce proton decay through coherence, it is important to find the conditions where superconductivi ty persists at high temperatures up to 7000K where some instances of the LENR reaction have been observed.

In this system, an interesting observation about how the weak force is operating in LENR

newinflow.ru/.../...

Quote:
Spectrometer X-123SDD records soft X radiation (0.1 - 30 keV) in heterogeneous plasmoid. X-receiver is arranged at different cross sections of PVR testing section and cross sections behind nozzle at L = 1 ÷ 100 cm from it.

• Heterogeneous plasmoid behind PVR nozzle is γ-radioactive. Soft X-radiation 100 - 10000 eV from this plasmoid. X-radiation decrement is very small (radiation intensity decrease is about 20% at L = 100 cm)
At the very tip of the reaction nozzle, there is gamma radiation produced by the weak force decay. But over a very short time as the plasma moves away from the reaction nozzle at supersonic speeds, even though the reaction temperature is initially 7000K or more, the level of radiation is reduced in stages until at L = 100cm, the x-ray energy level is nominal at 30 keV. This nominal 30 keV x-ray level is the level reported by Defkalion in their system using spark discharge.

Other systems using laser irradiation of various transition metal nanostructures show both the formation of tritium and its rapid decay as a simultaneous operation. The laser brings coherence to the LENR reaction as a catalyst for weak force amplification.

See

arxiv.org/.../1306.0830.pdf

"Tritium is another unstable isotope with half-life of 12.2 years. It would be interesting to induce its beta-decay by exposure to laser radiation, as it was done previously for other nuclides. In this work we demonstrate for the first time the nuclear synthesis and decay of Tritium under laser exposure of various targets in D2O.

I like these laser based experiments that reveal in the most basic terms what is happening in the bare bones LENR reaction.
Quote
 
 
0 #12 Axil 2016-12-23 22:20
Post 5 part 2

Kvazineytron produced during triple collision e + p + e (ep) + e and, on belief
author, is the principal agent of low energy transformations atoms [2].
At the core of Cs137 electron emission occurs in a vacuum and possible. In eyadre (eCs137) Departure
Cs137 nucleus of an electron would occur not in a vacuum but within the scope of the surrounding
electron that is apparently difficult or even impossible. Therefore eyadro
(ECs137) stable, or more likely, has a substantially greater half-life than
conventional core Cs137. Let us explain why. In the experiment, in fact, it is not measured by the number
Cs137 particles in a closed volume, and the number of disintegrations per unit of time, at which
permanent life time proportional to the number of radioactive nuclei. But if some of the nuclei
Cs137 during laser processing enters a different state, with the other,
long lifetime, the average speed of their disintegration will be reduced, with
decrease rapidly at first, and then, upon completion of the transition to a new Cs137 nuclei
condition (eCs137) everything slower and slower. This is the nature of the rate of change
Cs137 nuclei decay was observed and analyzed in the experiment for 10 hours. Therefore, most
all new eyadro (eCs137) is not stable and decomposes under the scheme (eCs137) Ba137 +
e + e +  c lifetime considerably greater than that of Cs137 nucleus which equals 30,167 years.
If an increase in the duration of laser irradiation the rate of decrease in the number
decays per unit time will decrease monotonically and tends to some
constant value, it means that a new state in the form of core (eCs137) (or in which either
some form of that, a priori, can not be excluded) it is not sustainable. This method of solutions
unusual problem? Yes, unusual. Unlikely? Maybe someone will seem even
incredible. But from the point of view of the theory of non-point of the electron is the solution to the problem
is a natural and consistent with the observed maximum continuous
X-ray spectrum at energies ~ 100 keV. And, most importantly, a different compelling
explanation of this method is very interesting experimental fact is not, and
therefore it has the right to exist until such time until a proposed
perfect way.
Literature
1. Laptuhov AI, Rukhadze AA Note on the characteristic size of the electron // Engineering
physics. 2015. №3. S. 19-23.
2. AI Laptuhov Electronic structure and electron-nuclea r forces. Kvazineytron as one of the
the main agents of the low-energy transformations of atoms // Engineering Physics. №9.
2014 S. 09-16 ..
Quote
 

Here is your generous contributions so far towards our $500,000 target, thanks everyone! : $45,020   Please Donate
See the current state of our booked costs here