With havin so much content do you ever run into any problems
of plagorism or copyright infringement? My blog has a lot of completely unique content I've either created myself or outsourced but it looks like a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet without my permission. Do you know any techniques to help stop content from being stolen? I'd genuinely appreciate it.


my website: herpesyl.: tipsfromjohn.s3.us-east-2.amaz onaws.com/.../

I'd like to thank you for the efforts you have put in writing this website.

I really hope to see the same high-grade content from you later on as well.
In fact, your creative writing abilities has inspired
me to get my very own website now ;)

Take a look at my page prodentim reviews
better business bureau: storage.googleapis.com/.../...

Howdy! I know this is kinda off topic however ,
I'd figured I'd ask. Would you be interested in trading links or maybe
guest writing a blog article or vice-versa? My site discusses a lot of the same subjects as
yours and I believe we could greatly benefit from each other.

If you happen to be interested feel free to shoot me an email.
I look forward to hearing from you! Wonderful blog by the way!


Check out my web blog: alpha bites reviews: www.youtube.com/.../

Good day! My name is Joel Lagace, and I have developed a unique type of PEG power cell. Some of my friends who have replicated the device have nicknamed it "Joel's Quantum Power Cell." While its operation shares similarities with the John Hutchison power cell, mine is polymer-based rather than crystal-based. John himself has commented on many of my YouTube videos where I demonstrate the construction, anomalies, and functionality of the PEG cell.

The PEG cell is composed of polyethylene glycol (PEG), which acts as both a solid-state electrolyte and a dielectric with electret properties. Remarkably, this cell can be conditioned at room temperature and even self-conditione d by shorting out the cell's electrodes. It appears to exhibit some of Tom Bearden's concepts, particularly in maintaining an open electrostatic dipole, as the cell consistently holds an electrostatic DC potential. Additionally, myself and others have observed what seems to be transient AC or noise from these cells.

The cell displays several anomalies, which I showcase as much as possible on my YouTube channel. Some of my followers have suggested that I reach out to you, as you may have the resources and expertise to better understand the phenomena associated with these cells. I'm even willing to send you some of my more robust cells, which have been operational for about three months, for you to test, analyze, and explore further.

Some effects we've noticed, though difficult to confirm without professional equipment, include:

Negative Resistance: The PEG cell exhibits negative resistance, meaning it can add energy to the circuit rather than dissipating it. This helps maintain the dipole by continuously supplying energy.

Nonlinear Ferroelectric Properties: The cell’s ferroelectric properties dynamically store and release energy, contributing to the stabilization of the dipole.

Self-Oscillation and Polarity Flipping: The PEG cell's ability to self-oscillate and flip polarity suggests it can modulate energy flow in a way that prevents the dipole from collapsing.

Source Identification and Dipole Stability:

Unidentifiable Source on Return Path: If the electrostatic effect can maintain a potential difference without a direct current path, the source of the potential may remain unidentified in a conventional sense, preventing the dipole from being "killed" by a return current.

Maintaining Dipole Stability: By using dielectric materials and managing electrostatic charges, the dipole can remain open, allowing for continuous extraction of potential energy, which aligns with Bearden’s principles.

Potential Solution:

Electrostatic Charge Management: Using polyethylene or other dielectric materials to manage electrostatic charges and induce polarity inversion could be part of the solution. This approach may help maintain a stable dipole and continuously harness energy without neutralizing the potential difference.

In summary, by employing polyethylene to wrap electrodes for electrostatic charge and utilizing dielectric materials for polarity inversion, it might be possible to isolate the system sufficiently to maintain a stable dipole. This could prevent the source from being identified and neutralized, potentially enabling continuous energy extraction as described by Bearden.

Moreover, these cells can produce a significant pulse if the polarity is reversed in a pulsed manner. The behavior of these cells has been observed by others who are replicating the design over at Beyond Unity forum.

Feel free to email me back if you are interested. Take care!

Hi Dr. Bob,,

I'm the guy who sent you the two NASA links and patent app from 9/2017. Recently a link was posted on the wiki for cold fusion, on the "talk" tab, to a bad effort by Jet Propulsion Lab's, Nasa paid effort to replicate the NASA Glenn work, JPL actually hit the prepared deuterated fuel with an ion beam. Almost all of the paper linked to is the effort #1 by JPL, which they botched by not using the same narrow beam x-ray tube, and exposed the DPE to an ion beam in order to neutralize static charge so it wouldn't attract Radon and Radon decay daughters which they say were responsible for the alpha and beta emissions that NASA Glenn saw. JPL does mention the fact that Glenn did use controls and that the controls didn't emit alpha and beta while the Deuterated fuel did emit. The second effort by JPL , using a better x-ray tube is only referred to on the last 1 or 2 pages. It seems possible that JPL destroyed the fuel by exposure to an ion beam in order to neutralize static charge and eliminate Radon/daughters that were not verified to even exist before x-ray exposure. Would you expect an ion beam to negatively affect the DPE fuel? Here is the link
arxiv.org/abs/1709.02380v1