The US team has completed the Pre Calibration (Step 0 in the V2.0 Protocol Table). I know it is not very impressive sounding to say we got through step zero, but it is an important piece of validating how the cells perform and how reliably they measure before we put in the Celani wire to test it. Getting a clean base line, or several in this experiment, is critically important.
The main questions we asked were:
- How stable and consistent are the temperatures we achieved at certain powers? How stable is it over a long period at a constant power?
- How much difference was there between these identically manufactured cells?
- How much difference in temperature readings are there when heating with one wire versus the other?
- Do the temperatures achieved validate Celani's Stefan-Boltzman estimation of calorimetry?
Repeatability and stability
To answer this question we did several calibration cycles and calculated the confidence intervals based on the variability seen, just like previous experiments. We last did these as a practice before adding the environment shell around the cells and measured confidence intervals after about 5 tests of roughly 1/2 a watt. Steps 5.a and 5.b in the protocol will have us recreate these while the Celani Wires are in place.
The third part of Step 0 in the protocol is holding the power constant for 16+ hours and observing how much the key measurements changed over that time. Below is a table summarizing the results.
Table of variation of temperature rise above ambient within the cell and on the glass over 20 hours at constant power (30 second averages of ~3 second data).
|
CELL A
|
CELL B
|
|
Ta_ext1_rise
|
Ta_mica_rise
|
Tb_ext1_rise
|
Tb_mica_rise
|
Max
|
80.24
|
152
|
82.89
|
154.43
|
Min
|
79.35
|
150.57
|
81.29
|
152.78
|
Max-Min
|
0.89
|
1.43
|
1.6
|
1.65
|
% Deviation
|
1.12%
|
0.95%
|
1.97%
|
1.08%
|
Difference between cells
After some early calibration tests showing large variation between the two cells, we engineered a better temperature controlled environment that would be less susceptible to air currents in the room changing. The measured ambient in that environment is nice and stable,
Difference between wires
Fit to Stefan-Boltzman
We found that, in our covered apparatus, at least, the Temperature vs Power In curve did not fit well to a constant factor. I welcome anyone else to try to see how well they can make it fit.
The latest calibration cycle: NiCr+Ox_130430_PreCal_CellA_CellB.xls
The Calibration cycle before that before we enclosed the cells: NiCr+Ox_130408_Vac_Calib.xls
I, also, eagerly anticipate Mathieu's data because his dual cells are in open air in a large room, so the thermal radiation will be more applicable.
We have not really come to any conclusions about the meaning of all this. Being that the cells are very close in design to Celani's original, I do think some comparisons can be made to the repeatability and stability his cell could have been expected to demonstrate. Thoughts?
Pictures of 400 Layer Celani Wires being installed into the US Cells.
Yesterday, after completing the calibration cycles and analysis, Malachi installed one 400 layer wire into both test cells. The images are added to this gallery.
After some much needed maintenance and cleaning, we finally had the time for Celani wire micrographs. Also note we figured out how to display a FIGURE KEY. This image is 434L (US cell B) treated wire with a small abnormality among the fuzzy topography typical of a Celani-treated surface.
434L treated surface (US Cell B) demonstrating, on a microscopic scale, the fragility of the oxide surface. Slight bends and manipulations easily flake off the outer surface of the wire. The entire bulk of the treated constantan is very brittle; just ask Malachi!
A closer look at the 434 treated topography.
The material used in these images is the very ends of excess wire, as we only have room in the cell to install ~85mm of Celani wire. The absolute tips of the wires go untreated because they are covered by the electrical contacts used to resistively heat the rest of the bulk. This is a close shot of the very end of the 477L wire that previously burnt out in US cell B, just as a reference to the differing topographies.
A larger view of the previous shot.
Close topography of the 360L wire installed in US cell B after the latest active wire burnout.
Buildup abnormality on 360L.
Odd green tint to the nichrome?
Reassembly of the passthrough flange.
Measuring the excess length of wire unused in cells but to be imaged with the SEM later.
Checking the passthrough impedance prior to wrapping. The brittleness of the oxide-treated Celani wire makes re-wrapping around the mica a difficult and risky process.
Slight discoloration at the tip of the Celani wire indicates where the wire was in contact with the power lead to heat it. These ~1cm sections of the wire were analyzed in comparison to their treated counterparts on the same length with SEM images (also shown in this gallery).
Inspecting the active wires for irregularities or damage from shipping. Additionally the ends of the wire are scraped to remove the oxide layer and establish good electrical connectivity.
The packets Celani ships the wires in have various information about their composition and treatment. This 477 layer treated wire was inserted into US Cell B, the control unit.
Disassembly of the calibrated cells.
Final assembly with the controlled air heater on it. We have set the controller to about 30C. It appears to be holding a constant temperature within 0.2 C.
The light weight cover over that allows access to the valves to each cell.
A view inside the air flow path. The controlled, heated air enter into the triangle space between the cells. From there, the air flow into the space at the head of each test cell and then along the cells, and out the back.
The ambient air sensors for each cell are shrouded in a white paper cone in order to keep any incident radiant heat from affecting the thermocouple.
Malachi fitting the shield around the cells in the vent hood.
Picture of the heater in place.
Cutting a hole for the controlled heater that will keep the air flow constant and just a little above the range of room temperatures so that a hot day won't throw the test off.
Malachi with the rough assembly ready to carefully fit the heater to and then fit around the cells.
Brief hand-sketch of the enclosure to help keep the V1.3 test cells in the USA in a constant temperature and constant air flow environment.
After some much needed maintenance and cleaning, we finally had the time for Celani wire micrographs. Also note we figured out how to display a FIGURE KEY. This image is 434L (US cell B) treated wire with a small abnormality among the fuzzy topography typical of a Celani-treated surface.
434L treated surface (US Cell B) demonstrating, on a microscopic scale, the fragility of the oxide surface. Slight bends and manipulations easily flake off the outer surface of the wire. The entire bulk of the treated constantan is very brittle; just ask Malachi!
A closer look at the 434 treated topography.
The material used in these images is the very ends of excess wire, as we only have room in the cell to install ~85mm of Celani wire. The absolute tips of the wires go untreated because they are covered by the electrical contacts used to resistively heat the rest of the bulk. This is a close shot of the very end of the 477L wire that previously burnt out in US cell B, just as a reference to the differing topographies.
A larger view of the previous shot.
Close topography of the 360L wire installed in US cell B after the latest active wire burnout.
Buildup abnormality on 360L.
Odd green tint to the nichrome?
Reassembly of the passthrough flange.
Measuring the excess length of wire unused in cells but to be imaged with the SEM later.
Checking the passthrough impedance prior to wrapping. The brittleness of the oxide-treated Celani wire makes re-wrapping around the mica a difficult and risky process.
Slight discoloration at the tip of the Celani wire indicates where the wire was in contact with the power lead to heat it. These ~1cm sections of the wire were analyzed in comparison to their treated counterparts on the same length with SEM images (also shown in this gallery).
Inspecting the active wires for irregularities or damage from shipping. Additionally the ends of the wire are scraped to remove the oxide layer and establish good electrical connectivity.
The packets Celani ships the wires in have various information about their composition and treatment. This 477 layer treated wire was inserted into US Cell B, the control unit.
Disassembly of the calibrated cells.
Final assembly with the controlled air heater on it. We have set the controller to about 30C. It appears to be holding a constant temperature within 0.2 C.
The light weight cover over that allows access to the valves to each cell.
A view inside the air flow path. The controlled, heated air enter into the triangle space between the cells. From there, the air flow into the space at the head of each test cell and then along the cells, and out the back.
The ambient air sensors for each cell are shrouded in a white paper cone in order to keep any incident radiant heat from affecting the thermocouple.
Malachi fitting the shield around the cells in the vent hood.
Picture of the heater in place.
Cutting a hole for the controlled heater that will keep the air flow constant and just a little above the range of room temperatures so that a hot day won't throw the test off.
Malachi with the rough assembly ready to carefully fit the heater to and then fit around the cells.
Brief hand-sketch of the enclosure to help keep the V1.3 test cells in the USA in a constant temperature and constant air flow environment.
SEM images being taken
An important part of the plan is to take SEM images of the wire before and after. Here you can see Wes inspecting a crack in the outer layer of the wire. We'll publish the images soon after we get a good set. Today, we can't figure out how to get the scale bar onto the CRT that faces the camera (we don't have the direct digitizer box).
Some days it feels like you have to build the sidewalk before you can take a walk. We have been troubleshooting and improving the power supply control and the data collection a fair amount this week as we struggle to get data out of the experiments and verify it.
Comments
do it. A small piece of charcoal or pencil lead can also be
used to put a tiny smudge on a card back.
Have a look at my blog post rubyfortune casino online
login - Reece: Google.Com.bd/.../
-
Short but very precise info… Thank you for sharing this one.
A must read post!
my site: sweet
bonanza xmas play: sweetbonanzaplay.click
The list price for the NI CompactDAQ hardware suggests a per-system cost of about $2-4K, depending on module selections. It sounds like NI has been good to LENR researchers thus far, and perhaps they would be willing to help out with the initial system purchase pricing a bit, for the MFMP lab units anyhow.
Many potential research institution partners already have substantial investment in National Instruments hardware and software, so this would likely dovetail reasonably well with their lab setups.
With the ethernet-connec ted module racks, we can use a wide variety of software options running on a lab server to analyze, condition and distribute data to downstream web interface components.
I noticed that most of the operational code is in PHP, which isn't a great choice for time-sensitive, high-reliabilit y functions. I would suggest a re-write of the core aggregation and analysis functions away from PHP and into a C or C++ native deamon process running on a small solid-state linux data server of some sort, that is independent of the main web distribution network loading. I'd be happy to help sketch up architecture.
Given that the full HUGnet DAQ system is apparently not yet fully mature and ready to scale up, it may make sense for the initial MFMP replication effort to use off-the-shelf components that do not require undue additional debugging and support time from MFMP staff or participants.
I poked around a bit for open-source DAQ systems, and while there are a number of candidates, it struck me that most of them will incur self-support overhead of a nature similar to what we currently face with HUGnet.
Although it will cost an apparently-insu rmountably-high amount up front, I think investment in commercial, off-the-shelf hardware such as a National Instruments CompactDAQ series of ethernet-connec ted modular component systems makes sense.
We are also starting to look for people to architect and code a new version of the whole data repository and web display and annotation system that will become a new Live Open Science site.
The firmware and hardware are not open source, yet. That is partly because we have been thinking that it may be a nice product base some day, but also partly from lack of experience managing that kind of open source project. But, I am open to suggestions. Brainstorm it up!
Has everyone there just given up on this?
Ed
edpell @ optonline .net (no spaces)
We are tracking a large bug in our firmware currently. Until we find it our control software will not work. So we are dead in the water until we find it. More updates soon!
This configuration approximates over a small area the metal-encased concentric calorimeter, in that it is capable of measuring the substantial cell heat output as IR emission. This is an important improvement over an all-glass cell .
See magicsound.us/MFMP/copper_black_finish.pdf for details and references
To put it more clearly, I'm referring to its use in these cells in particular. If we were to use quartz glass for example, strong UV light (a possible / suggested trigger for LENR) would over time cause its discoloration, which would affect IR thermalization over time and skew from starting calibrations.
Borosilicate glass (which is what has been chosen for v1.3 cells, I think), although it's less heat-resistant than quartz glass, should have more stable properties. But what if other things (residues from heated components?) slowly affected its IR transparency? We've already seen that when a wire gets overheated the glass tube gets irremediably coated with copper / nickel particles and has to be replaced. Could this also slowly happen with use over time?
It might sound like I'm just arguing for the sake of it, but it's the sort of things which would make any apparently positive result quickly fall apart unless it's very large.
That's another good point.
I think it should be also worth investigating if over time the glass tubes used retain their IR transparency properties. A further reason for using a 100% IR-opaque tube, in my opinion.
For example, I'd expect that an oxidized costantan wire exposed to hydrogen should deoxidize (water is formed), so the constantan will get shiny and therefore get a lower emissivity (shiny metals typically have lower emissivities).
Anyway, using the steel&glass cell (with the probe placed on the external steel surface of course) would clear all doubts regarding this matter.
FollowingIn contrast with 123star's comment (though it is a different issue than what noted in this blogpost), I am thinking that the progressively blackening behavior of the active wire over extended amounts of active time under hydrogen (experienced by MFMP) somehow makes reported temperatures higher and might actually explain where the apparent xs heat increase over time comes from. Adding acetone as suggested by Celani immediately makes the wires turn black, exacerbating this issue which would otherwise take weeks to show.I fear there might be unexpected issues with this calorimeter due to the transparent glass tube and the only way to test wire performance properly with it is either by wrapping the tube with some sort of metallic foil (with temperature sensors on top of the foil, not under it) or using a more advanced setup like the steel&glass cell which for all intents and purposes is like putting the glass tube inside a black box.
RSS feed for comments to this post